I blame Radio 4's
News Quiz for the fact that every time I hear the name Abu Qatada,
this song passes through my brain. Once I have dispelled
those catchy lyrics, I reflect on the sheer nonsense talked by Tory backbenchers, the tabloids and Labour spokespersons.
The Daily Mail runs with "
...even his own mother wants him deported to Jordan". She says, "
I don’t know why the British keep him. There is no good reason. I can’t see why they would want him" which of course contradicts the rest of the Mail's article which says the British don't want him. Perhaps too much to ask the Daily Mail to distinguish between Britain
cannot deport Abu Qatada but
can allow him to go if he wants.
The Daily Telegraph leads with former Security Minister, Lady Neville-Jones, who said that possible avenues included ignoring the ruling from the European Court of Human Rights and facing the consequences. They also report that Downing Street has not ruled out the possibility of a deportation in defiance of the European Court. A spokesman said “
We are committed to removing him from the country...”
Tory MP Robert Halfon fulminated on the radio that Britain (he meant the UK) is a sovereign country and shouldn't be told what to do by foreigners. I imagine he exempts Rupert Murdoch from this restriction. The Sun is running a petition calling on Cameron "
...to ignore the Strasbourg judges and send Qatada back to his home country Jordan."
Nor is Labour exempt from playing to the gallery as usual. Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said, “
The Government has not done all it can to stop this man being released from a high security prison." Well we know Labour's dismal record on human rights.
Apparently Abu Qatada is a very dangerous man, in which case, as Shami Chakrabarti has repeatedly asked, why don't we prosecute him ?
Here are three facts the foaming zenophobes might like to consider, facts not opinions.
1) The right to a fair trial is not an invention of any European institution. In the UK it goes back to
Magna Carta. Naturally the British lawyer who drafted the European Convention of Human Rights included it.
2) The jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights (By the way, I suppose it's expecting too much to ask the europhobes to understand and explain that this is nothing to do with the European Union) is established not by invasion nor foreign dictat but by treaty freely entered into by a British government.
3) The Human Rights Act gave British courts the power to apply the European Convention of Human Rights. The option of "
defying Strasbourg" is nonsense. Deporting Abu Qatada without the required guarantees could be challenged in British courts.
